1 |
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 12:19 pm, Deedra Waters wrote: |
2 |
> A lot of people have told me after the fact that having seperate |
3 |
> judicial and investigative branches make things too complicated and the |
4 |
> end result is too much red tape. Some disagree and think that things |
5 |
> won't/aren't too complicated. |
6 |
|
7 |
well, this sounds like moving back to the 'way it was' right ? we've seen |
8 |
that way doesnt work quite so well, while the new way hasnt really been |
9 |
tested |
10 |
|
11 |
> Basically, for the most part, the transparency of how complaints are |
12 |
> handled stays the same. The only thing i really want to change, is that |
13 |
> i think that a commitee of say 3 to 5 people handles a complaint from |
14 |
> beginning to end. |
15 |
|
16 |
so you're talking about merely reducing numbers here rather than changing |
17 |
anything else about how the complaint process is handledright ? all other |
18 |
aspects of the process in terms of what needs to be done (investigate, |
19 |
communication, council balance check, etc...) are unchanged ? |
20 |
|
21 |
i'm not saying i agree with the idea, i just want to be sure of the exact |
22 |
details of the proposal |
23 |
-mike |
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list |