| 1 |
On Monday 06 June 2005 01:27 pm, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 2 |
> My understanding is that a dev who is suspended loses all access to |
| 3 |
> -core. Is that right? Assuming so, it occurs to me that if we expect |
| 4 |
> the dev to come back (and I assume we do, or the dev would be expelled |
| 5 |
> instead of suspended), then perhaps it would make more sense to only remove |
| 6 |
> write access to -core, while leaving read access? An alternative would |
| 7 |
> be if we archived -core, and the newly reinstated dev could then read |
| 8 |
> the archives, but read-only access seems simpler. The rationale is that |
| 9 |
> in those rare cases where suspended devs return, it benefits Gentoo if |
| 10 |
> the suspended dev is able to stay up to date. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I have no problem with it.. I assume that people will forward threads to a |
| 13 |
suspended dev anyway, so may as well have it. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-C |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Corey Shields |
| 19 |
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team and Devrel Team |
| 20 |
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees |
| 21 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields |
Archives