Gentoo Archives: gentoo-devrel

From: Deedra Waters <dmwaters@g.o>
To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 19:19:16
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.63.0509061412050.6803@monster
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc by Mike Frysinger
Hrmm, basically the way things used to work was that a complaint was
filed, looked into, and dealt with by the devrel leads. That did not
work, I'll be the first to admit that one, and it didn't work largely
because things were not documented well at all.

I'm proposing basically what's already in the proposal, accept that
those say...5 people have the right to look into things and make their
recommendation. It might help things if i put together a written
proposal to make things clearer. I've not had time to get that far yet.

Basically, this sisposes with the judicual/investigation team consepts
though, and makes things much easier to track.
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote:

> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 13:41:24 -0400 > From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> > Reply-To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o > To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o > Subject: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc > > On Tuesday 06 September 2005 12:19 pm, Deedra Waters wrote: >> A lot of people have told me after the fact that having seperate >> judicial and investigative branches make things too complicated and the >> end result is too much red tape. Some disagree and think that things >> won't/aren't too complicated. > > well, this sounds like moving back to the 'way it was' right ? we've seen > that way doesnt work quite so well, while the new way hasnt really been > tested > >> Basically, for the most part, the transparency of how complaints are >> handled stays the same. The only thing i really want to change, is that >> i think that a commitee of say 3 to 5 people handles a complaint from >> beginning to end. > > so you're talking about merely reducing numbers here rather than changing > anything else about how the complaint process is handledright ? all other > aspects of the process in terms of what needs to be done (investigate, > communication, council balance check, etc...) are unchanged ? > > i'm not saying i agree with the idea, i just want to be sure of the exact > details of the proposal > -mike >
-- Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure - dmwaters@g.o Gentoo linux: -- gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list