[gentoo-doc-cvs] cvs commit: gcc-optimization.xml

[Josh Saddler]

nightmorph    07/07/01 21:02:14

  Modified:             gcc-optimization.xml
  Log:
  slightly revised the bit on ldflags support according to a comment hanno and some others made on irc, and the new filename still sucks by the way

Revision  Changes    Path
1.5                  xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml

file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml?rev=1.5&view=markup
plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml?rev=1.5&content-type=text/plain
diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml?r1=1.4&r2=1.5

Index: gcc-optimization.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- gcc-optimization.xml	28 Jun 2007 05:14:50 -0000	1.4
+++ gcc-optimization.xml	1 Jul 2007 21:02:14 -0000	1.5
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
 
-<!-- $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml,v 1.4 2007/06/28 05:14:50 nightmorph Exp $ -->
+<!-- $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml,v 1.5 2007/07/01 21:02:14 nightmorph Exp $ -->
 
 <!DOCTYPE guide SYSTEM "/dtd/guide.dtd">
 
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@
 <!-- See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5 -->
 <license/>
 
-<version>1.1</version>
-<date>2007-06-27</date>
+<version>1.2</version>
+<date>2007-07-01</date>
 
 <chapter>
 <title>Introduction</title>
@@ -539,10 +539,10 @@
 <p>
 Don't use them. You may have heard that they can speed up application load times
 or reduce binary size, but in reality, LDFLAGS are more likely to make your
-applications stop working. They are not supported, and you can expect to have
-your bugs closed and marked INVALID if you report errors with packages while
-using LDFLAGS. At the very least you will have to recompile all affected
-packages without setting LDFLAGS.
+applications stop working. They are not supported, and you may have your bugs
+closed and marked INVALID if you report errors with packages while using
+LDFLAGS. At the very least you will have to recompile all affected packages
+without setting LDFLAGS.
 </p>
 
 </body>



-- 
gentoo-doc-cvs@g.o mailing list