| 1 |
Xavier Neys wrote: |
| 2 |
>> This implies manual changing of several files which is not good, IMHO. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Why? We change a small number of docs once, then forget about them. |
| 6 |
> Do you think it is better to introduce more code, more complexity to be |
| 7 |
> maintained, more stuff to be executed on each and every doc request? |
| 8 |
> Is that your definition of better? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I'm not familiar with inner workings of gorg/axkit and I don't know |
| 11 |
anything about speed issues or expensiveness of XML transformations, sorry. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> If we mark some files as unmaintained, we're also telling our users that |
| 14 |
> non-marked files *are* maintained. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Good point, but IMHO we are now telling that *everything* is maintained |
| 17 |
("file is on gentoo.org -> it's official"). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> You should try to think about feasibility, implementation & consequences |
| 20 |
> first. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
That's why I included "[RFC]" in the subject. I don't know if it is |
| 23 |
possible and worth the effort, I'm just asking. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Cheers, |
| 26 |
-jkt |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth |
Archives