| 1 |
В Сбт, 18/09/2010 в 21:34 +0200, Tobias Heinlein пишет: |
| 2 |
> Peter Volkov wrote, on 09/16/2010 06:46 PM: |
| 3 |
> > Hi, guys. While there is some job required to move portage tree into git |
| 4 |
> > it looks like moving documentation and web-site could be done much |
| 5 |
> > easier. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Yeah, git++. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> > Are there any plans to move on git? Was anything done in this |
| 10 |
> > direction? This will simplify translator's job as we are planning to use |
| 11 |
> > git that makes commits faster and allows us to ease workflow. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Who is "we" in this case? The translators? If yes, has there been some |
| 14 |
> discussion? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Yes, translators. And there was no discussion yet. Grand plan is to use |
| 17 |
transifex and everything more or less works (testing version is on |
| 18 |
transifex.gentoo.ru) but we are going to move on transifex.net and |
| 19 |
update everything for upcoming transifex-1.x. Once done we'll announce |
| 20 |
this since we'll need to attract translators and I guess this experience |
| 21 |
could be of interest for others too. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> Also, how exactly does it ease workflow? Is there something specific for |
| 24 |
> translating stuff that CVS can't do? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
We need branches (for workflow - one for translators and one for |
| 27 |
editors) and speed (it's pain to use CVS history to see changes) and too |
| 28 |
many problems we are all well aware about :) CVS has no advantages for |
| 29 |
documentation so may be we just move gentoo repository on git? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Peter. |
Archives