Gentoo Archives: gentoo-doc

From: Peter Volkov <pva@g.o>
To: gentoo-doc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-doc] Documentation/website in git?
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:39:51
Message-Id: 1284896227.24593.331.camel@tablet
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-doc] Documentation/website in git? by Tobias Heinlein
В Сбт, 18/09/2010 в 21:34 +0200, Tobias Heinlein пишет:
> Peter Volkov wrote, on 09/16/2010 06:46 PM: > > Hi, guys. While there is some job required to move portage tree into git > > it looks like moving documentation and web-site could be done much > > easier. > > Yeah, git++. > > > Are there any plans to move on git? Was anything done in this > > direction? This will simplify translator's job as we are planning to use > > git that makes commits faster and allows us to ease workflow. > > Who is "we" in this case? The translators? If yes, has there been some > discussion?
Yes, translators. And there was no discussion yet. Grand plan is to use transifex and everything more or less works (testing version is on but we are going to move on and update everything for upcoming transifex-1.x. Once done we'll announce this since we'll need to attract translators and I guess this experience could be of interest for others too.
> Also, how exactly does it ease workflow? Is there something specific for > translating stuff that CVS can't do?
We need branches (for workflow - one for translators and one for editors) and speed (it's pain to use CVS history to see changes) and too many problems we are all well aware about :) CVS has no advantages for documentation so may be we just move gentoo repository on git? -- Peter.


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-doc] Documentation/website in git? Tobias Heinlein <keytoaster@g.o>