| 1 |
On 12/06/10 12:24, Joshua Saddler (nightmorph) wrote: |
| 2 |
> +<impo> |
| 3 |
> +The exception to this rule is<path>/doc/en/metadoc.xml</path>. Metadoc should |
| 4 |
> +still use the existing point version scheme. So<c>1.119</c> becomes<c>1.120</c>, not |
| 5 |
> +<c>1.12</c>. |
| 6 |
> +</impo> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Hi Josh, I've got a few questions for this one. First of all, I believe |
| 9 |
it should read "not <c>2</c>" instead of 1.12. Also, what's the reason |
| 10 |
for metadoc.xml being special? I assume it's because you can't be sure |
| 11 |
that none of our XSLT stuff breaks, which is a fair concern. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I'll try to walk through them to see if I see an obvious error, but it's |
| 14 |
gonna take some time. If someone else likes XSLT, please step up and go |
| 15 |
ahead with checking, I'm simply offering my services here because I've |
| 16 |
done some XSLT stuff based on gorg for my pet project a few years ago, |
| 17 |
and I have feeling that nobody else has ever touched XSLT since Xavier |
| 18 |
disappeared. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Cheers, |
| 21 |
-jkt |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth |
Archives