1 |
Sven Vermeulen posted on Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:16:35 +0000 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 06:18:07PM +0000, Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
4 |
>> So, considering the idea of having a section added to "Working with |
5 |
>> Portage" |
6 |
>> called "Advanced Portage Features", this is what it could look like: |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~swift/docs/previews/hb-portage-advanced.xml |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Bug #396549 is used for tracking. I also added a section in it about |
11 |
> /etc/portage/postsync.d. |
12 |
|
13 |
Good. |
14 |
|
15 |
I thought about suggesting a postsync.d mention too, but decided that it |
16 |
might be old/stale cruft related to the ed catmur scripts that I used to |
17 |
run that seem to be the basis of some of these recent portage extensions |
18 |
(like /etc/portage/patches, and this one too, IIRC) as I didn't see |
19 |
anything in the portage (5) manpage about it. |
20 |
|
21 |
So unless the portage docs for postsync.d are there and I just missed |
22 |
them, you/I/we might want to ask the portage folks about including the |
23 |
documentation in the portage manpage as well. |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
27 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
28 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |