| 1 |
Jan Kundrát wrote: |
| 2 |
> Xavier Neys wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>Some doc dev complained that comparing the dates would not work if two |
| 5 |
>>updates occurred in the same day. True. Comparing the versions is a bit |
| 6 |
>>more complex and involves two extra scans of the handbooks (the original |
| 7 |
>>and the translated one). It's fast enough IMO. My <300Mhz test box still |
| 8 |
>>delivers handbook chapters under the second. Note that it is still not |
| 9 |
>>100% fool-proof. If a chapter disappears from the original, the mention |
| 10 |
>>of a more recent original would not appear on the translations because |
| 11 |
>>the xsl scans the original and compares the version with the version of |
| 12 |
>>the file that is included at the same position (part/chapter-wise) in |
| 13 |
>>the translation. That has not happened yet. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>>I'm not going to parse the version strings to try to quantify the amount |
| 16 |
>>of changes that occurred because 1) versions are not structured 2) a |
| 17 |
>>single bump could mean a small or a big change, and vice-versa for more |
| 18 |
>>bumps. Displaying the date of the original should be a good indication. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Thanks, I like this idea. Am I correct when I assume that it will check |
| 22 |
> both handbook-$ARCH.xml and hb-$foo-$bar.xml when displaying only one |
| 23 |
> chapter and all files for current $ARCH when doing ?full=1 ? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Almost. |
| 26 |
Full handbook: all files are checked |
| 27 |
TOC (part and/or chap = 0), master file is checked |
| 28 |
Chapter, hb-$foo-$bar.xml is checked, checking the master files as well would |
| 29 |
be trivial, but why should they be checked? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Cheers, |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
/ Xavier Neys |
| 35 |
\_ Gentoo Documentation Project |
| 36 |
/ French & Internationalisation Lead |
| 37 |
\ http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en |
| 38 |
/\ |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
gentoo-doc@g.o mailing list |
Archives