1 |
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera |
2 |
(klondike) <klondike@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> Well what I want to ask here is how should we aproach this. As things stand |
4 |
> now: |
5 |
> The open rc upgrade guide mentions both (which is ok) |
6 |
> The gentoo bsd guide just refers to adjkerntz (which is ok) |
7 |
> The hand book refers only to hwclock (which is "ok" as long as there doesn't |
8 |
> appears a gentoo-bsd handbook). |
9 |
> Tthe localization guide still refers to the older clock one, here I'd like |
10 |
> to say: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> If, |
13 |
> for some reason, you need your hardware clock not to be in UTC, |
14 |
> you will need to edit <path>/etc/conf.d/hwclock</path> (or if you |
15 |
> use Gentoo BSD <path>/etc/conf.d/hwclock</path> and change |
16 |
> the value of <c>clock</c> from <c>UTC</c> to <c>local</c>. |
17 |
|
18 |
My main concern here is that there will be a place where the number of |
19 |
choices is too big. Also, you'll risk getting a higher frequency on |
20 |
bug reports on such paragraphs. Think for instance bootloaders, how |
21 |
would we deal with guides there? I'm sure we do not want to generate |
22 |
separate guides for just all this sort of stuff (and then use |
23 |
keywords)... |
24 |
|
25 |
What about making it generic (edit your clock management configuration |
26 |
like, like /etc/conf.d/hwclock on ... )? |
27 |
|
28 |
Wkr, |
29 |
Sven Vermeulen |