1 |
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 03:01:04PM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote: |
2 |
> Xavier Neys wrote: |
3 |
> > Of course, users reading a 2004.3 handbook should realise it's old, but they |
4 |
> > could at least be told it's not maintained anymore so that 1) they can read it |
5 |
> > with a grain of salt 2) they should not bother submitting bugs. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> IMHO that's against what SwifT said about fixing? |
8 |
|
9 |
No, because we have an updated handbook (namely the 2005.3/current one). |
10 |
Unlike with articles of which we don't have an updated one, any bugreports |
11 |
against outdated handbooks can be marked as WORKSFORME/INVALID because it is |
12 |
fixed in the more recent ones. |
13 |
|
14 |
Wkr, |
15 |
Sven Vermeulen |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Gentoo Foundation Trustee | http://foundation.gentoo.org |
19 |
Gentoo Documentation Project Lead | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gdp |
20 |
Gentoo Council Member |
21 |
|
22 |
The Gentoo Project <<< http://www.gentoo.org >>> |