1 |
Jose Luis Rivero wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 09:42:38PM +0200, Xavier Neys wrote: |
3 |
>> Jose Luis Rivero wrote: |
4 |
>>> 1. Currently, there are no official maintained handbooks. We have the |
5 |
>>> networking handbooks (/doc/*/handbook/handbook-*) marked as draft and |
6 |
>>> the networkless docs which refers to latest stable release (2007.0) |
7 |
>>> marked as unmaintained. |
8 |
>> /doc/en/handbook/ and /doc/en/handbook/2008.0/ are officially maintained. |
9 |
>> Them being marked 'draft' does not make them any less official. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> "Disclaimer : This document is a work in progress and should not be |
12 |
> considered official yet." |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Probably people reading this is not going to consider them as official. |
15 |
> |
16 |
>>> 2. There are no docs covering a networking installation for the latest |
17 |
>>> stable release. Users who don't want to use the beta can't find the |
18 |
>>> docs to make a network based installation since they were overwriting |
19 |
>>> by 2008.0 (which is still a beta). |
20 |
>> draft was moved up because anyone using the latest docs and a 2007.0 media |
21 |
>> on a modern system (read about 1 year old or more recent) could not go very |
22 |
>> far in the installation process. Besides, those completing a 2007.0 install |
23 |
>> would then need to upgrade some many packages that it was deemed better to |
24 |
>> move up the draft version. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Maybe some kind of warning or note about this can help the people to |
27 |
> understand the situation. |
28 |
> |
29 |
>>> One idea for next time could be keeping current and networkless |
30 |
>>> handbooks maintained until the release reaches an stable status and |
31 |
>> Networkless will always be under xxxx.y |
32 |
>> 2007.0 is still there, 2008.0 is already there. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> "Disclaimer : This handbook has been replaced by a newer version and |
35 |
> is not maintained anymore." This warning in 2007.0 is not going to make the |
36 |
> users go for this and if you try to find a newer version all you have is |
37 |
> a beta. Same problem than above. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> I'm for keeping networkless under xxxx.y but keep the latest stable |
40 |
> version out of 'unmantained' could help during beta phase. |
41 |
> |
42 |
>>> develop the new docs in /doc/*/handbook/beta/ |
43 |
>> That is done in /doc/en/handbook/draft/ |
44 |
>> We moved it up earlier than at official release time as already explained. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> ACK. |
47 |
> |
48 |
> Thanks Xavier. |
49 |
|
50 |
As you know, the packages are still stable whether in 2007.0 or |
51 |
2008.0betaX. There's no practical difference between the two, though |
52 |
obviously you won't have so many updates if you use a beta tarball. The |
53 |
only difference is the LiveCDs/DVDs. |
54 |
|
55 |
Assuming this trend of public betas continues through coming releases, |
56 |
we may want to add a note explaining this -- that the installed system |
57 |
and packages are identical to the latest versions in Portage; it's only |
58 |
the media that's "beta". Or we could even add one now, and make it |
59 |
conditional on something like an "is_beta" key or similar in the TOC. |