Gentoo Archives: gentoo-doc

From: Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o>
To: gentoo-doc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-doc] svn vs cvs
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 11:58:59
In Reply to: [gentoo-doc] svn vs cvs by Grant Goodyear
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 03:28:58PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> One of the consequences of the management restructuring is that at some > point stuff in gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en will probably move around. Of > course, doing that in CVS is a royal pain. I'd love to see our gentoo > tree migrate over to svn (not the portage tree, just gentoo!), but of > course you folks are the major users of that tree. Has this been > considered? This tree is still fairly large, so it might not yet be > feasible w/ svn, but I don't know if anybody has tried.
I wouldn't mind to move over to SVN personally. Just Another Versioning Tool. But I do hope that SVN (don't know it really) supports: - Running a tool right before the check-in is made permanent (in this case, check for GuideXML syntax, but in future might be expanded) - Annotate function Just don't ask us to migrate to ClearCase... Wkr, Sven Vermeulen -- Gentoo Foundation Trustee | Gentoo Documentation Project Lead | Gentoo Council Member The Gentoo Project <<< >>>


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-doc] svn vs cvs "Jan Kundrát" <jkt@g.o>