| 1 |
Alexey Chumakov wrote: |
| 2 |
> Using the link in the document itself ls like any decentralized way: |
| 3 |
> + efficiency -- no need to parse metadoc for each page |
| 4 |
> + reliability -- no broken links on metadoc failure |
| 5 |
> + flexibility -- works with non-metadoc project docs |
| 6 |
> - human factor -- document maintainer is responsible for the link |
| 7 |
> - need to update path in several places if source moves |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
- redundance -- exactly same information is duplicated in several places |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Using metadoc, the pros are: |
| 12 |
> + clearness for the lead translator (...or actually not?) |
| 13 |
> + simplicity of batch update (isn't often? |
| 14 |
> Cons are the opposite. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Are we centralized or not? :-) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
/me is by no means XML guru, but I always thought that metadoc.xml was |
| 19 |
made for something like that... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Cheers, |
| 22 |
-jkt |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth |
Archives