| 1 |
On Thursday 17 January 2008, Christopher Friedt wrote: |
| 2 |
> I was just wondering if I should submit a bug report for |
| 3 |
> sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 on Gentoo's main bugzilla - |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
yes |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> gcc-4.1.2-patches-1.0.2.tar.bz2/patch/62_all_gcc4-noteGNUstack.patch |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
i just stole it from Fedora |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Incorrect: |
| 12 |
> --- libffi/src/arm/sysv.S.jj 2004-10-28 15:10:11.000000000 +0200 |
| 13 |
> +++ libffi/src/arm/sysv.S 2005-02-08 16:14:02.282767581 +0100 |
| 14 |
> @@ -207,3 +207,6 @@ LSYM(Lepilogue): |
| 15 |
> .ffi_call_SYSV_end: |
| 16 |
> .size |
| 17 |
> CNAME(ffi_call_SYSV),.ffi_call_SYSV_end-CNAME(ffi_call_SYSV) |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> +#if defined __ELF__ && defined __linux__ |
| 20 |
> + .section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits |
| 21 |
> +#endif |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
blah, this gets screwed up often and only building for arm shows it. the |
| 24 |
stupid arm assembler (unlike everyone else on the planet) uses @ as a comment |
| 25 |
separator, so it needs to be changed to % for arm. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> There are several similar patches in that file, and they all share the |
| 28 |
> same syntax, so I would imagine that all of the lines containing |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> + .section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> are incorrect in the whole patch file, but I cannot confirm. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
it's only an issue on arm. this is why i try to use % in all my .S files |
| 35 |
rather than @ as all assemblers treat % the same. |
| 36 |
-mike |
Archives