| 1 |
Heath H Holcomb wrote: |
| 2 |
> I've created my embedded development rootfs. Why is the profile linked |
| 3 |
> to /usr/portage/profiles/uclibc/x86/2.4? Can I relink it to a 2.6 profile |
| 4 |
> (/usr/portage/profiles/uclibc/x86/linux26). |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
That profile is deprecated. /usr/portage/profiles/uclibc/x86 should get you all |
| 7 |
the 2.6 goodness from above. The standard in the profiles seems to be 2.6 by |
| 8 |
default, and use ....../2.4 if that's what you are after. Don't know why our |
| 9 |
stages use the 2.4 profile since vapier screams at people that don't use 2.6. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Is 2.6 going to work with uclibc? Will a 2.6 kernel compile correctly, or are |
| 13 |
> there problems I should be aware of? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I'm using it without any trouble. There are a number of devices that don't have |
| 17 |
2.6 kernels that will work on them fully. (most of the PDAs I know of, broadcom |
| 18 |
based routers, etc.) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
--Iggy |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives