1 |
On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 08:20, Michael Imhof wrote: |
2 |
> Hi Sven, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Sven Blumenstein wrote: |
5 |
> > Hi all, |
6 |
> > I just want to throw in this question: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > Should we drop the arm arch? |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Just to summarize some facts why this question goes through my head: |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > - afaik we have no arm developer as they all went to zynot |
13 |
> > - a great amount of DEPEND.bad archs are caused by [~]arm keyworded |
14 |
> > packages |
15 |
> > - is anyone actually using Gentoo on arm? |
16 |
> What about this gentoo for zaurus anouncement? |
17 |
Yeah, these guys: |
18 |
|
19 |
http://www.opensistemas.com/Gentoo_for_Zaurus.715.0.html |
20 |
|
21 |
This is exactly what I personally have been wanting for gentoo and |
22 |
handhelds. |
23 |
> Wouldn't this be gentoo on arm? |
24 |
Yes it would be. This would also include a number of Hp Ipaq's too. |
25 |
|
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Regards |
29 |
> Michael |
30 |
> |
31 |
> |
32 |
> -- |
33 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
34 |
> |
35 |
Bryan Duff |
36 |
duff0097@×××.edu |
37 |
You have to run as fast as you can just to stay where you are. If you |
38 |
want to get anywhere, you'll have to run much faster. -- Lewis Carroll |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |