| 1 |
On 2/9/10, Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
| 2 |
> wireless wrote: |
| 3 |
> > This patent looks like the poster child for embedded system, |
| 4 |
> > that should not have been issued. |
| 5 |
> Pretty much, it looks like. It covers any CPU+FPGA system where the |
| 6 |
> FPGA is used for any of signal I/O, co-processing, HID, graphics, |
| 7 |
> signal processing, communications and battery charging. :) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
It should be unenforceable due to prior art (and should not have been |
| 10 |
granted for the same reason). Of course, the idiots in question might |
| 11 |
still try to waste your time. Intellectual property? Intellectual |
| 12 |
theft! |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
M |
Archives