| 1 |
On 24/07/2011 12:05, Peter Volkov wrote: |
| 2 |
> В Срд, 13/07/2011 в 11:55 +0100, Ed W пишет: |
| 3 |
>> On 07/07/2011 09:30, Dennis.Yxun wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Hi Ed W: |
| 5 |
>>> I'm not gentoo dev, and actually not uClibc guy ;-) |
| 6 |
>>> But I do suggest you file a bug on http://bugs.gentoo.org |
| 7 |
>>> so people who see may help |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> There are lots of open bugs there. The appeal is to find developers who |
| 10 |
>> can commit the fixes? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> There is possibility to maintain packages via proxy-maintaining[1]. As |
| 13 |
> for uClibc I can help you as a proxy, although it'll take some time for |
| 14 |
> me to review changes you wish to have in the tree. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> [1] http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise/wiki/ProxyMaintainer |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Sure - I don't really have time to act as a gentoo developer at present, |
| 19 |
but that also seems true of a lot of the -embedded dev team. I'm making |
| 20 |
a bunch of local ebuilds and it would be useful to feed those upstream |
| 21 |
and try and get them into the main tree as quickly as possible. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
For sure I can feed bugzilla, but there are plenty of bugs there already |
| 24 |
- closing them is the issue, not opening more... |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I'm using uclibc, slightly newer than latest release. Actually with |
| 27 |
this I see VERY few problems with other ebuilds and my local patch tree |
| 28 |
has shrunk to near zero. Pushing that out to tree would be highly |
| 29 |
desirable, but I only have x86 to test with - we need some non x86 |
| 30 |
testers to prove things |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Note that uclibc feel that they release infrequently enough that every |
| 33 |
release should be considered stable and no one should be lagging the |
| 34 |
latest release. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
How can we make this happen? |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Ed W |
Archives