1 |
Peter Stuge wrote: |
2 |
> wireless wrote: |
3 |
>> This patent looks like the poster child for embedded system, |
4 |
>> that should not have been issued. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Pretty much, it looks like. It covers any CPU+FPGA system where the |
7 |
> FPGA is used for any of signal I/O, co-processing, HID, graphics, |
8 |
> signal processing, communications and battery charging. :) |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I'm sorry, but I find it too hilarious that "a system with an FPGA" |
11 |
> can be patented. It's a little bit like patenting the patent system.. |
12 |
> ;) |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
Wide open was my take too. Way to broad, so I sure it will |
16 |
get challenged as soon as somebody tries to enforce it. The |
17 |
real danger is if somebody like Microsoft buys the patent, |
18 |
then there is trouble against small companies who innovate. |
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
>> Hopefully Europeans are not this stupid to allow this sort of |
23 |
>> patent-garbage to even be filled, let alone enforced. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> I wouldn't bet on it.. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
> //Peter |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
I find this most disturbing. America is owned by lawyers and |
32 |
crooks, in the disguise of corporation. Europe was the last |
33 |
bastion of anti-imperialism........? |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
No wonder most startups build their products in S. America |
37 |
or Asia and just import them to the US....... and |
38 |
politicians are looking for jobs? |
39 |
|
40 |
Fix the stupid patent system.... |
41 |
|
42 |
/end/rant |
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
James |