| 1 |
Done [1]! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
It was google chrome that wouldn't give me the option to continue with |
| 4 |
the bug report, so I just used a different browser. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Apparently though, a similar mechanism already exists for OpenRC |
| 7 |
called swclock instead of hwclock, and they said I should just do |
| 8 |
this: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
rc-update del hwclock boot |
| 11 |
rc-update add swclock boot |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Still, that only exists for OpenRC, AFAIK, not the regular baselayout, |
| 14 |
so any images that don't use OpenRC would need to be updated. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Thanks, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
C |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376249 |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> wrote: |
| 23 |
> Hi Christopher. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> В Сбт, 23/07/2011 в 13:10 -0400, Christopher Friedt пишет: |
| 26 |
>> I have a couple of boards that ship by default without RTC devices |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
>> PS: I was going to file a bug report, but it seems that the |
| 29 |
>> certificate for bugs.gentoo.org has become invalid ATM. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Please open a bug report. Certificates should be valid now. Probably |
| 32 |
> it's good idea to show this problem to openrc guys, so they could |
| 33 |
> review/suggest solution. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> -- |
| 36 |
> Peter. |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> |
Archives