| 1 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote on 2010/10/10 00:14:29: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Friday, October 08, 2010 08:00:46 Joakim Tjernlund wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Some minor issues I have noted when using my own |
| 5 |
> > portage tree(PORTDIR): |
| 6 |
> > -------------------------------------- |
| 7 |
> > !!! INVALID ACCEPT_KEYWORDS: x86 |
| 8 |
> > Calculating dependencies |
| 9 |
> > !!! 'sys-kernel/linux-headers' has a category that is not listed in |
| 10 |
> > /etc/portage/categories |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > !!! 'sys-devel/gcc' has a category that is not listed in |
| 13 |
> > /etc/portage/categories |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > !!! 'sys-devel/binutils' has a category that is not listed in |
| 16 |
> > /etc/portage/categories ... done! |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> does yourt PORTDIR suck ? if you dont provide proper profiles/ tree, then the |
| 19 |
> answer is yes, and this output is not related to crossdev at all. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Probably, it is several years old :) I will check what is wrong with |
| 22 |
the profile then. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> > crossdev also prints this: |
| 26 |
> > * Using sys-devel/binutils from /usr/local/src/TM-fs/toolchain/portage |
| 27 |
> > instead of /usr/local/src/TM-fs/toolchain/portage |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> the problem seems to be your custom PORTDIR is also listed in your overlays |
| 30 |
> which doesnt make much sense. use one or the other. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
ah, I don't want crossdev to pick up stuff outside my portage tree. That |
| 33 |
is why I point the overlay to the same tree. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Jocke |
Archives