Gentoo Archives: gentoo-embedded

From: "Peter S. Mazinger" <ps.m@×××.net>
To: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-embedded@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] some uClibc experience
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:35:26
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-embedded] some uClibc experience by Ned Ludd
On 17 Nov 2003, Ned Ludd wrote:

> On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 19:46, Peter S. Mazinger wrote: > > On 12 Nov 2003, Ned Ludd wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 16:31, Peter S. Mazinger wrote: > > > > There are problems building some of the binaries with propolice enabled > > > > gcc, mainly the .hidden support in binutils has to be "hidden" from gcc, > > > > but as I can see (read), the glibc version does not work flawlessly > > > > either. > > > > > > > Have you successfully used ssp with uclibc? > > It worked (somehow, not quite correct, and some packages where not > > rebuildable) at the time where uClibc had support for LIBGCC_FUNCTIONS > > (adding functions from libgcc to libc) This was the only way I got a > > system running it (__guard and __smash... where added to libc). Since then > > I cannot modify buildroot so that I get a system running, segfaults on all > > the line (tested only with gcc-3.3.x and protector 3.3-5). I think the > > solution would be to add the needed functions to uClibc (and remove them > > from libgcc!!!). > > One of the hardened-gcc version introduced guard symbols to libgcc.a. > I'm pretty sure this no longer should be the case if your running ~arch > as they are in fact getting introduced into glibc. > If you care to hack the functionaly into uClibc I'll point you at the > glibc version from etoh
Where do I find the modified protector patch for gcc? Peter -- Peter S. Mazinger <ps.m@×××.net> ID: 0xA5F059F2 NIC: IXUYHSKQLI Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2 ____________________________________________________________________ Miert fizetsz az internetert? Korlatlan, ingyenes internet hozzaferes a FreeStarttol. Probald ki most! -- gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-embedded] some uClibc experience Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>