1 |
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 12:59:25PM -0700, AJ Armstrong wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Although I agree that all ebuilds built for the embedded project should be |
6 |
> part of the portage tree (probably need some new categories), so that they |
7 |
> could be installed using vanilla emerges on platforms with the guts to |
8 |
> support it, should we perhaps consider a new emerge (emberge?, emergemb?, |
9 |
> crossmerge?), using many of the portage facilities, but designed to support |
10 |
> cross-compiling and building a target filesystem, rather than installing on |
11 |
> the local box. This would exist alongside emerge, but have its own config |
12 |
> file structure , etc. |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
Well if you go poke around in buildroot you'll notice they have little |
16 |
uclibc patches for openssl and openssh... plus a couple other little |
17 |
tools. |
18 |
I've made my own uclibc toolchain ebuilds, and believe me they aren't |
19 |
easy. Getting gcc to play nice with uclibc is an ugly hack at |
20 |
best... I'm not sure why gcc doesn't have --libc as a autoconf option. |
21 |
|
22 |
anyway, my point was... patches for uclibc compat. It will be |
23 |
interesting to see how much hackage is needed. On the one hand uclibc |
24 |
people see to suggest that everything should 'just work'(tm), but they |
25 |
provide an awful lot of patches that suggest the contrary. |
26 |
so making a different tree may be the answer, but keeping it 'in sync' |
27 |
with gentoo-portage doesn't sound like fun. |
28 |
|
29 |
> such supstantial changes in portage and things like make.conf that we're |
30 |
> unlikely to get them without (1) a long fight (2) giving up some things we |
31 |
> want. Also, multi-platform cross-compiler support is such a significant |
32 |
> retrofit that I'm wondering if it wouldn't result in either a nasty |
33 |
> bag-on-the-side or a second system effect if we try to re-engineer portage. |
34 |
> |
35 |
|
36 |
maybe we have to put in our suggestions to portage 2.0 redesign and |
37 |
hope :-( |
38 |
|
39 |
and as for namings ... I'm partial to submerge ;-) but I felt I was |
40 |
clever in naming that. |
41 |
Dave |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |