Thankyou - reassuring to get a similar list. If anyone constanly gets a asm
operand error I have had it fairly constantly. Will post more if I work it
> I see we have some init files etc.. Do you think we going to have
> problems with the baselayout-lite stuff the other guys have been working
Once baselayout-lite gets going a bit more I'll get rid of most of these.
There is some benefit to keeping this self contained.
> Anyway I'm rebuilding now with my USE flags from before minus nls now.
> USE="-nls" emerge --debug uclibc-buildroot 2> /tmp/new.x
> Then I plan on switching to the CHOST to i386-linux-uclibc-3.2.3 and see
> if the uclubc-buildroot can bootstrap itself. I'll try various other
> combinations so we can get this bad boy working for ~arch.
I haven't tried lots of permutations so thankyou. I will look at stripflag to
see how/if it can be used on configurations.
> I know mutex has some stuff he's been working on from the catalyst
> approach that sound very promising, hopefully we can all tie this
> (uclibc, crossdev, catalyst, baselayout stuff) back in together with
> each other.
All for it.
> Looking at the ebuild makes me wonder if we really need sys-libs/glibc
> or if virtual/glibc would work in the DEPENDS. Any insights?
I haven't tried compiling uclibc-buildroot with uclibc. Once its a bit more
tested a virtual would be applicable.
I've removed the PROVIDE virtual for the time being. A few people reported
breakages because of it.
Daniel Black <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Gentoo Embedded Project
email@example.com mailing list