Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: dnlt0hn5ntzhbqkv51 <dnlt0hn5ntzhbqkv51@×××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: SSP-Bug patch for qt-4.1.2 !?
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 18:55:36
Message-Id: op.taubr2galbd8ez@you.and.your.horse
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: SSP-Bug patch for qt-4.1.2 !? by "Kevin F. Quinn"
1 <snip>
2
3 THANKS! For the one-of shortcut - easy to understand for this newbie.
4
5 Good News 1. The shortcut process worked great - and it helped me
6 understand how emerge works.
7
8 Good News 2. The "Fix" worked. Screensaver no longer killed by SSP.
9
10 Bad News! The "patch" didn't work. The first "heap" worked fine; the
11 second "heap" failed. (Would be nice if patch would show the text that it
12 found at the line it was told match.) At any rate, I used an editor to
13 delete the line (that patch didn't find in heap 2) - so the logic of the
14 fix worked great.
15
16 I can post the above (not GN 1 :-) ) on the bug page if you wish.... but
17 given that I'm a newbie, I'm reluctant.
18
19 Question: IIUC, this is a compiler bug!? If yes, has it been fixed in the
20 new gcc (I went to the gcc change log and saw no mention of it)?
21
22 Thanks again for you generous and high-quality help!
23
24 >
25 > An easier way to do it as a one-off process is to:
26 >
27 > first save Andre's patch from bug #133301 to somewhere
28 >
29 > # ebuild /usr/portage/x11-libs/qt/qt-3.3.6-r1.ebuild unpack
30 > # cd /var/tmp/portage/qt-3.3.6-r1/work/qt-x11-free-3.3.6
31 > # patch -p1 < [patch saved from bug]
32 > # cd
33 > # ebuild /usr/portage/x11-libs/qt/qt-3.3.6-r1.ebuild merge
34 >
35 > just note that if you emerge qt-3.3.6-r1 again later, the change will
36 > be lost - but you're not likely to do that soon.
37 >
38
39
40
41 --
42 gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list