1 |
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 23:40 +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:20:32 -0700 |
3 |
> Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 20:51 +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: |
6 |
> > > Hi, |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > Are there any plans for official vserver+grsecurity sources? They have |
9 |
> > > patches on the vserver frontpage. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > Not officially. But users report being able to swap in the vserver |
12 |
> > patched grsec easy enough over the 4450_grsec.. But long term I do not |
13 |
> > think this is something hardened directly wishes to support cuz the |
14 |
> > patching tends to involve ~30 or so rejects. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> why not use the patches on vanilla? |
17 |
|
18 |
vanilla or not. grsec-only and vserver touch several of the same areas |
19 |
the in a kernel. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
> > phreak however has an ebuild for sys-kernel/vsgrsec-sources in dev |
23 |
> > overlay http://dev.gentoo.org/~phreak/dist/ |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > -- |
26 |
> > Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
27 |
> > Gentoo Linux |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > -- |
30 |
> > gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
31 |
> > |
32 |
-- |
33 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
34 |
Gentoo Linux |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |