Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: "Peter S. Mazinger" <ps.m@×××.net>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Problems compiling xen - please help...
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 10:15:54
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.44.0602041111470.6559-100000@lnx.bridge.intra
In Reply to: [gentoo-hardened] Problems compiling xen - please help... by Ed W
1 On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Ed W wrote:
2
3 > I am trying to get Xen running under a hardened kernel. The machine is
4 > currently booted with "selinux=1 enforcing=0". I am having trouble
5 > compiling:
6
7 the CFLAGS miss (at least) -DKERNEL
8 >
9 >
10 > gcc -DDEBUG -D_ACPI_ -DTEXTADDR=0x000D0000 -I. -I../../../tools/libxc
11 > -Wall -fno-builtin -O2 -msoft-float -m32 -march=i686 -D__ASSEMBLY__
12 > -DDEBUG -D_ACPI_ -DTEXTADDR=0x000D0000 -c trap.S
13 > gcc -DDEBUG -D_ACPI_ -DTEXTADDR=0x000D0000 -I. -I../../../tools/libxc
14 > -Wall -fno-builtin -O2 -msoft-float -m32 -march=i686 -c vm86.c
15 > gcc -DDEBUG -D_ACPI_ -DTEXTADDR=0x000D0000 -I. -I../../../tools/libxc
16 > -Wall -fno-builtin -O2 -msoft-float -m32 -march=i686 -c setup.c
17 > gcc -DDEBUG -D_ACPI_ -DTEXTADDR=0x000D0000 -I. -I../../../tools/libxc
18 > -Wall -fno-builtin -O2 -msoft-float -m32 -march=i686 -c util.c
19 > cpp -P -DDEBUG -D_ACPI_ -DTEXTADDR=0x000D0000 vmxassist.ld > vmxassist.tmp
20 > ld -o vmxassist -m elf_i386 -nostdlib --fatal-warnings -N -T
21 > vmxassist.tmp head.o trap.o vm86.o setup.o util.o
22 > vm86.o: In function `address':
23 > vm86.c:(.text+0x19): undefined reference to `__guard'
24 > vm86.c:(.text+0x56): undefined reference to `__stack_smash_handler'
25 > vm86.o: In function `trace':
26 > vm86.c:(.text+0xe9): undefined reference to `__guard'
27 > vm86.c:(.text+0x141): undefined reference to `__guard'
28 > vm86.c:(.text+0x15d): undefined reference to `__stack_smash_handler'
29 > vm86.o: In function `getreg':
30 > vm86.c:(.text+0x278): undefined reference to `__guard'
31 > vm86.o: In function `.L23':
32 > ...etc...
33 >
34 >
35 > I have tried various combinations of compiler using gcc-config. Neither
36 > gcc-3.4.4 or gcc-3.3.6 seem to do any better, hardened or not
37 >
38 > I suspect that this could be a problem with the compiler still using
39 > some hardend profile despite me asking for a non-hardened gcc? Can
40 > anyone please help debug this
41 >
42 > Ed W
43 >
44
45 --
46 Peter S. Mazinger <ps dot m at gmx dot net> ID: 0xA5F059F2
47 Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
48
49 --
50 gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list