| 1 |
how would be the /etc/make.conf in order to compile X in this case....? |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 23:12:42 +0200, pageexec@××××××××.hu |
| 4 |
<pageexec@××××××××.hu> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > Do you think the problem is with the new hardened gcc specs that |
| 6 |
> > > automatically adds -fPIC if no -fPIC is found? |
| 7 |
> > > This flipflop logic may be the cause for the .a library getting misbuilt |
| 8 |
> > > as PIC with the gcc internal preparation function showing up in the |
| 9 |
> > > object files... |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > we do not enforce -fPIC, the enforcement is -fPIE (it should be somehow |
| 12 |
> > different, not usable in shared libs) |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> well, whichever it is, it makes those .o files PIC and then the elfloader |
| 15 |
> will barf on those symbols. i guess -fPIE can end up being enforced if |
| 16 |
> these modules are not compiled with -shared or whatever else your specs |
| 17 |
> file logic would trigger on. as i said in the previous answer, the correct |
| 18 |
> solution is to teach the elfloader to handle hidden symbols properly. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> -- |
| 24 |
> gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Marco Morales |
| 31 |
------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 32 |
aka Soulse |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
"La posibilidad de realizar un sueño es lo que hace la vida interesante" |
| 35 |
- Paulo Coelho |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Mi blog: http://soulse.blogspot.com/ |
| 38 |
Site Feed: http://soulse.blogspot.com/atom.xml |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives