Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-hardened] musl profile
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:04:12
Message-Id: m338an1s36.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org
1 I'm testing the hardened/musl profile.
2
3 The initial emerge world wants to downgrade some (but not all) of the
4 packages which have replacements in hardened-dev. They include:
5
6 sys-apps/tcp-wrappers-7.6.22-r1::gentoo [7.6.22-r99::hardened-dev]
7 sys-apps/net-tools-1.60_p20130513023548-r1::gentoo [1.60_p20130513023548-r99::hardened-dev]
8 sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r7::gentoo [2.88-r999::hardened-dev]
9 sys-apps/sandbox-2.6-r1::gentoo [2.6-r999::hardened-dev]
10 sys-apps/attr-2.4.47-r1::gentoo [2.4.47-r99::hardened-dev]
11 net-misc/iputils-20121221-r1::gentoo [20121221-r99::hardened-dev]
12 dev-libs/libxml2-2.9.1-r5:2::gentoo [2.9.1-r99:2::hardened-dev]
13
14 I do not see any reason why it doesn't like the hardened-dev versions.
15
16 Trying, eg, emerge -v =sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r999 (with or w/o
17 the ::hardened-dev suffix) gives:
18
19 emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r999".
20
21 The ::gentoo version fail to merge.
22
23 Any thoughts on why portage refuses the overlay versions?
24
25 -JimC
26 --
27 James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-hardened] musl profile Hinnerk van Bruinehsen <h.v.bruinehsen@×××××××××.de>