From: | pageexec@××××××××.hu | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] PaX vs emerge updates? | ||
Date: | Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:45:41 | ||
Message-Id: | 469D6FFE.18202.369EC6E@pageexec.freemail.hu | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-hardened] PaX vs emerge updates? by Christian Parpart |
1 | On 18 Jul 2007 at 1:22, Christian Parpart wrote: |
2 | > I fear a little in using PaX because when you mark a binary with certain |
3 | > flags, that are doomed to be destroyed as soon as you upgrade the according |
4 | > ebuild that installed this binary executable. |
5 | > |
6 | > Is there any ideal way to deal such situations or am I missing some point? |
7 | |
8 | if an ebuild doesn't do the marking itself, it's a bug in there |
9 | and you should report it in bugzilla. |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |