Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From:	Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To:	gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-hardened] persistent paxctl -m?
Date:	Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:52:46
Message-Id:	`1239389562.28096.16.camel@hangover`
In Reply to:	Re: [gentoo-hardened] persistent paxctl -m? by Grant

1	> Thanks for the suggestions everyone. I think this type of persistence
2	> should be built into portage. Maybe /etc/portage/package.nomprotect.
3
4	> Do you agree? Should I file a bug?
5	Not really. No.
6
7
8
9	--
10	Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
11	Gentoo Linux