1 |
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 09:10, Marco Venutti <veeenrg@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> I see the GR-Security, provided in Hardened Gentoo, |
3 |
> is not the bare patch, but an "itself-patched" version, |
4 |
> so I'm wondering if these improvements become |
5 |
> part of the (following releases of the) official patch, |
6 |
|
7 |
The Gentoo patches for the hardened kernel are largely cosmetic, |
8 |
changing configure-time portions to fit the Gentoo world-view. For |
9 |
the 2.6.29 kernel, they: |
10 |
|
11 |
- Remove 'grsec' from the kernel's version text |
12 |
- Reduce the compile-time warnings produced by grsecurity |
13 |
- Allow PaX to be enabled without enabling grsecurity |
14 |
- Set different (Gentoo-appropriate) default GIDs for the logging & |
15 |
restriction portions |
16 |
- Add Gentoo's profiles (server, workstation, etc.) for grsecuriity |
17 |
- Add the source IP to SELinux AVC messages (the only functional change) |
18 |
- Completely remove the ability to enable COMPAT_VDSO |
19 |
|
20 |
> or not; I'm asking this just because, if improvements |
21 |
> are not included in the official patch, maybe it's better, |
22 |
> for me, to use the gentoo-hardened-kernel-source, |
23 |
> not-so-up-to-date, but improved! |
24 |
|
25 |
Gentoo's hardened-sources is probably the way you want to go, |
26 |
regardless. It incorporates the latest version of grsecurity for the |
27 |
given kernel version, and despite of being "behind" the kernel curve, |
28 |
it's highly stable. |