1 |
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 05:20:59PM +0000, Robert Sharp wrote: |
2 |
> On 23/11/16 16:59, Robert Sharp wrote: |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > On 23/11/16 15:58, Jason Zaman wrote: |
5 |
> >> Either is fine, but im probably just gonna stabilize the 2.6 userspace |
6 |
> >> in a couple weeks so that one is likely easier. and setools4 is waaay |
7 |
> >> better than 3. The important point is that you dont want to have both |
8 |
> >> policy.29 and policy.30 around. Then you get weirdness like if you |
9 |
> >> downgrade a kernel or something random it'll load in the old policy |
10 |
> >> which probably doesnt work properly, so whichever you pick, make sure |
11 |
> >> you nuke the other one. and semodule -B will rebuild the whole policy |
12 |
> >> again and load it. |
13 |
> > OK - I will go with policy.30 and add the keywords etc. I did a couple |
14 |
> > of local policy changes that may not be needed so will they disappear |
15 |
> > in all of this or do I need to remove them somehow first? |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > Thanks for all your help, |
18 |
> > Robert |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> Sorry - noticed a couple of things while preping the emerge: |
21 |
> |
22 |
> 1) selinux-base-policy is blocking policycoreutils so presumably I need |
23 |
> to add that to my accept_keywords? |
24 |
> 2) this package has the "unconfined" use flag set but I don't use |
25 |
> unconfined. Does that matter? |
26 |
|
27 |
Oh, yeah the 2.6 userland needs at minimum 2.20151208-r6. Its been long |
28 |
enough, i'll stabilize the new policies right away so just wait a bit |
29 |
any sync again. |
30 |
|
31 |
unconfined useflag just builds it, if you are using strict you can turn |
32 |
off unconfined and set this in make.conf: |
33 |
POLICY_TYPES="strict" |
34 |
then it wont even build the targetted modules at all. |