| 1 |
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Gordon Malm <gengor@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Sunday, April 5, 2009 08:54:22 Grant wrote: |
| 4 |
> > >> I use a program called miro a lot, but since upgrading to gcc-4.3.3, |
| 5 |
> > >> it segfaults if I don't issue: |
| 6 |
> > > |
| 7 |
> > > what's the package name? or what ebuild do you use? |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > >> grsec: signal 11 sent to /usr/bin/miro.real[miro.real:19177] |
| 10 |
> > >> uid/euid:1000/1000 gid/egid:100/100, parent /usr/bin/miro[miro:19176] |
| 11 |
> > >> uid/euid:1000/1000 gid/egid:100/100 |
| 12 |
> > >> |
| 13 |
> > >> and since miro.real is a python script: |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > in that case you have to use paxctl on the python interpreter, not |
| 16 |
> > > the script. but before that it's better to find out why it crashes, |
| 17 |
> > > so you should produce a coredump and analyze it. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > Thank you, I ran 'paxctl -m /usr/bin/python' and now miro starts |
| 20 |
> > without softmode enabled. I use the miro ebuild from this bug: |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131527 |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > - Gramt |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Don't know what miro is and didn't bother to look at the bug, but removing |
| 27 |
> MPROTECT on python is not good. One alternative might be to write simple |
| 28 |
> wrapper in C for miro and paxctl that instead. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Gordon Malm (gengor) |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
Miro is a slick little IPTV client written mostly in python. It was |
| 34 |
previously called democracy player or similar. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Removing MPROTECT on python is simply the wrong thing to do. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
quantumsummers |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
quantumsummers@g.o |
| 42 |
msummers42@×××××.com |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
"...there are no rules here -- we're trying to accomplish something." |
| 45 |
- Thomas A. Edison |
Archives