| 1 |
On 01/12/12 21:37, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 11/22/2012 12:49 PM, Javier Juan Martínez Cabezón wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> Hi all, I saw that in the last ebuild (3.4.1), PaX is in |
| 6 |
>> UNIPATCH_EXCLUDE. What have you Planned about this?. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> I also knew the existence of a base rsbac_policy based hardened gentoo |
| 9 |
>> subproject? is there anything written about it? |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> Thanks for all. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> When last I tried to apply the pax patches on top of rsbac, they did not |
| 15 |
> go. People kept saying the did, but they did not without hacking. If |
| 16 |
> you want to provide me with an rsbac patchset and pax patchset that are |
| 17 |
> compat I will try again. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Hi Anthony, thanks for your reply. I think that there are no one PaX |
| 22 |
version compatible with rsbac patch by default without patching at hand. |
| 23 |
They are always rejections in mm.c and some others, and always in the |
| 24 |
same places and it seems it will not change in the future. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
This is really tricky because to solve it I don't always know if I'm |
| 27 |
doing things in a correct way. |
Archives