Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: Joshua Brindle <method@g.o>
To: gentoo-hardened@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] The state of ebuild signing in portage
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 18:25:57
Message-Id: 20030421T132634Z_B95E00150000@gentoo.org
1 >What is the minimum number of bits for inner-keyring keys? developer keys?
2 >Will this number change over time to accomodate increased CPU technology?
3
4 No, this is a good point to bring up. Once we get nearer to implementation
5 we'll make these sort of decisions and keep everyone informed.
6
7 >On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 01:39:38AM -0500, Joshua Brindle wrote:
8 ><snip>
9 >> Implementation:
10 >>
11 >> * There will be an inner-keyring of senior developers holding keys.
12 >> These keys are the master keys used to sign developer keys.
13 >> They are not used to sign data in portage directly.
14 >>
15 >> *** The exact number of keys and holders has not been decided but
16 >> for a developer to be recognized by portage he will have to
17 >> have his key signed by the lower bound of N/2 of the inner-ring
18 >> keys. For example, if we have 5 inner keys then a developer
19 >> will have to have a key signed by at least 2 of them.
20 >>
21 ><snip>
22 >> Developer use:
23 >> --------------
24 >> * Each developer has one key used exclusively for ebuild signing.
25 >> * Each developer must have their key signed by at least the lower
26 >> bound of N/2 inner-ring keys.
27 >> * Each developer should have a strong passphrase and good
28 >> protection for their key.
29 >> * Developers will use repoman to digest and sign manifests.
30
31
32
33 --
34 gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list