Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: "Max R.D. Parmer" <maxp@××××××××.is>
To: Alex Efros <powerman@××××××××.name>, gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Technical repercussions of grsecurity removal
Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 00:18:02
Message-Id: 1494634672.363667.975060048.16742F31@webmail.messagingengine.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Technical repercussions of grsecurity removal by Alex Efros
1 On Fri, May 12, 2017, at 16:38, Alex Efros wrote:
2 > Hi!
3 >
4 > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 09:10:43PM +0200, "Tóth Attila" wrote:
5 > > Please take a look at on the reply of PaxTeam postend on the openwall
6 > > mailing list:
7 > > http://openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2017/05/11/2
8 >
9 > What's for? It's pointless. Only very few people are really interested
10 > (i.e. not just curious) in knowing who is paid by which company for doing
11 > what, who makes more real bugs, and who lies about something.
12 >
13 > The important questions about how to keep current level of protection for
14 > individual/small business users and how users of some distributions like
15 > Gentoo/Ubuntu/Android can be protected with GrSec/PaX are still
16 > unanswered.
17 >
18 > While large companies may buy subscription for GrSec/PaX the mentioned
19 > above categories of users can't (correct me if I'm wrong, please) - so
20 > effectively the change in GrSec policy makes harm and punish mostly these
21 > categories of users. If that's real GrSec/PaX goal - it's very sad but
22 > they probably have rights to do this (except their public reasoning
23 > doesn't match what they actually do, so probably there are some unsaid
24 > reasoning exists too), but if it's not their real goal - then they
25 > probably should provide some options for these categories of users too.
26 >
27 > --
28 > WBR, Alex.
29
30 Individuals can certainly request a quote -- I did -- their director of
31 sales is very patient, considerate and accommodating. Unfortunately the
32 price is quite a bit more than I can personally afford at present.
33
34
35 I don't personally doubt PaXteam/Spenders stated reasoning. It appears
36 they've encountered a quite aggravating situation with what may amount
37 to plagiarists. The post Dr. Toth linked closely mirrored what I
38 initially anticipated from observing kspp and the like from afar. I
39 think they're in a crap situation and what they've done is one of the
40 better of several bad options.
41
42
43 So, I am considering the costs of alternative control environments for
44 my personal systems, perhaps it will be worth the quoted price after all
45 once I've assessed options.
46
47 But, point being, if paying is not out of the question I think you
48 should request a quote.
49
50
51 --
52 0x7D964D3361142ACF