| 1 |
В Wed, 2 Oct 2013 22:58:35 +0200 |
| 2 |
"Tóth Attila" <atoth@××××××××××.hu> пишет: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> 2013.Október 2.(Sze) 21:07 időpontban Magnus Granberg ezt írta: |
| 5 |
> > onsdag 02 oktober 2013 20.41.32 skrev Alex Efros: |
| 6 |
> >> Hi! |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:21:00PM +0200, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: |
| 9 |
> >> > > I can test proprietary nvidia if someone provide me with modified |
| 10 |
> >> ebuild |
| 11 |
> >> > > or patch or instructions what's to do. |
| 12 |
> >> > |
| 13 |
> >> > If you want to try, you could try the xorg-2.eclass from here: |
| 14 |
> >> I've tried both rebuilding only xorg-server first, restart X, then |
| 15 |
> >> rebuilde all x11-drivers/* packages and reboot (to reload kernel |
| 16 |
> >> module) - in both cases everything works fine with proprietary nvidia. |
| 17 |
> >> |
| 18 |
> >> I've also tried nouveau and nv drivers, but got "Failed to load … |
| 19 |
> >> undefined symbol: …" errors (with different symbols for each driver). |
| 20 |
> >> Maybe this happens because some other libs should be recompiled, or |
| 21 |
> >> because of already loaded nvidia kernel module. |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > When i tred nouveau and the radeaon driver i needed to define the load |
| 24 |
> > order of |
| 25 |
> > the drivers modules else i did get undefined symbols. On radeon i could |
| 26 |
> > not |
| 27 |
> > even load some of the needed modules. But all this was some long time ago. |
| 28 |
> > /Magnus |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> Aha! |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> As a last step I also compiled radeon with full relro. And Xorg fails to |
| 33 |
> load. |
| 34 |
> The error message says: |
| 35 |
> Failed to load /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so: |
| 36 |
> /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so: undefined symbol: |
| 37 |
> exaWaitSync |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> So radeon still needs lazy. But Xorg and other drivers are RELRO now. |
| 40 |
> I have to say the first load of X takes a bit longer than usuall - makes |
| 41 |
> sense because of the BIND_NOW... |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> How I can define the load order of the modules? |
| 44 |
> I may play around with it. A bit more false sense of security! :-) |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> Thx: Dw. |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
Same problem with glamor. See comment 1 for an example of how to |
| 49 |
define the load order of modules. |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488906 |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
-- |
| 54 |
Alexander Tsoy |
Archives