Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: Jan Klod <janklodvan@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] resource overstep RLIMIT_CORE
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:27:10
Message-Id: 200901201925.22910.janklodvan@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] resource overstep RLIMIT_CORE by Ned Ludd
1 On Tuesday 20 January 2009 15:45:25 Ned Ludd wrote:
2 > On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 11:17 +0000, Jan Klod wrote:
3 > > On Tuesday 20 January 2009 10:49:24 Manuel Leithner wrote:
4 > > > On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:40:33 +0100, Jan Klod wrote:
5 > > > > Hi list,
6 > > > >
7 > > > > could someone explain the meaning and possible causes (if possible)
8 > > > > of this message: "denied resource overstep by requesting 4096 for
9 > > > > RLIMIT_CORE against limit 0?
10 > > >
11 > > > One of your processes crashed and tried to dump its core, but since the
12 > > > RLIMIT_CORE is set to 0 (i. e. no core dumps are to be created), it
13 > > > can't do so.
14 > >
15 > > Ah, so it is just a secondary problem. Its ssmtp crashing. First it makes
16 > > a segfault, then receives signal 11 by grsec, then overstep.
17 >
18 > A segfault is signal 11. It's not two events but one. And grsec is not
19 > sending the signal in anyway but rather just logging that it happened.
20 >
21 > > Anyone here using
22 > > it with grsec?
23 >
24 > Lots of people.
25
26 In my case it is 2.62-r{2,5} on hardened-sources-2.6.25 with most of
27 grsecurity options enabled and I can't get it working... Maybe someone of
28 those lots has some suggestion? How to find out the problem or what is known
29 to work?

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-hardened] resource overstep RLIMIT_CORE Magnus Granberg <zorry@×××.nu>