1 |
Ter, 2009-02-10 às 10:40 -0800, Ned Ludd escreveu: |
2 |
> On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 19:17 +0100, Thomas Sachau wrote: |
3 |
> > Cyprien Nicolas schrieb: |
4 |
> > > 2009/2/10 Matthew Summers <msummers42@×××××.com>: |
5 |
> > >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:04 AM, Tom Hendrikx <tom@×××××××××.net> wrote: |
6 |
> > >>> Clemente Aguiar schreef: |
7 |
> > >>>> I understand that the profiles where updated recently (last year?). |
8 |
> > >>>> |
9 |
> > >>>> Available profile symlink targets: |
10 |
> > >>>> [1] hardened/amd64 * |
11 |
> > >>>> [2] hardened/amd64/multilib |
12 |
> > >>>> [3] selinux/2007.0/amd64 |
13 |
> > >>>> [4] selinux/2007.0/amd64/hardened |
14 |
> > >>>> [5] default/linux/amd64/2008.0 |
15 |
> > >>>> [6] default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop |
16 |
> > >>>> [7] default/linux/amd64/2008.0/developer |
17 |
> > >>>> [8] default/linux/amd64/2008.0/no-multilib |
18 |
> > >>>> [9] default/linux/amd64/2008.0/server |
19 |
> > >>>> [10] hardened/linux/amd64 |
20 |
> > >>>> |
21 |
> > >>>> Available profile symlink targets: |
22 |
> > >>>> [1] hardened/x86/2.6 * |
23 |
> > >>>> [2] selinux/2007.0/x86 |
24 |
> > >>>> [3] selinux/2007.0/x86/hardened |
25 |
> > >>>> [4] default/linux/x86/2008.0 |
26 |
> > >>>> [5] default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop |
27 |
> > >>>> [6] default/linux/x86/2008.0/developer |
28 |
> > >>>> [7] default/linux/x86/2008.0/server |
29 |
> > >>>> [8] hardened/linux/x86 |
30 |
> > >>>> |
31 |
> > >>>> |
32 |
> > >>>> I would like to know what hardened profile I should use when I build new |
33 |
> > >>>> machines? (AMD64 as well as x86) |
34 |
> > >>>> |
35 |
> > >>>> Thanks. |
36 |
> > >>>> |
37 |
> > >>>> |
38 |
> > >>>> |
39 |
> > >>> A few days ago I switched an x86 machine from "default/linux/x86/2008.0" |
40 |
> > >>> to "hardened/linux/x86/2008.0/server" after some arbitrary rummaging in |
41 |
> > >>> the profiles directory. This gave me no problems other than the expected |
42 |
> > >>> gcc-4 -> gcc-3 downgrade. |
43 |
> > >>> |
44 |
> > >>> I'm not sure why this profile isn't listed in the eselect profile |
45 |
> > >>> listing above. It doesn't give me a big fat "unsupported profile" |
46 |
> > >>> warning though... |
47 |
> > >>> |
48 |
> > >>> Regards, |
49 |
> > >>> Tom |
50 |
> > >>> |
51 |
> > >> |
52 |
> > >> This is a confusing situation. I am currently using |
53 |
> > >> /usr/portage/profiles/hardened/linux/amd64/2008.0. |
54 |
> > >> |
55 |
> > >> This is not explicitly listed in the output of 'eselect profile list'. |
56 |
> > >> |
57 |
> > >> Perhaps we could sort this out on the list & then I will write a quick doc |
58 |
> > >> to place in the hardened web space to assist other users. |
59 |
> > >> |
60 |
> > >> -- |
61 |
> > >> M. Summers |
62 |
> > >> |
63 |
> > >> "...there are no rules here -- we're trying to accomplish something." |
64 |
> > >> - Thomas A. Edison |
65 |
> > >> |
66 |
> > > |
67 |
> > > On #gentooo-hardened, I got this answer : |
68 |
> > > |
69 |
> > > Feb 04 20:10:51 <Tommy[D]> Anyone can say, which profile of the 2 |
70 |
> > > hardened ones are supported here? |
71 |
> > > Feb 04 20:12:01 <gengor> Tommy[D]: use hardened/${ARCH}/2.6 |
72 |
> > > |
73 |
> > > But it was not listed by Clemente for amd64 |
74 |
> > > |
75 |
> > > -- |
76 |
> > > Cyprien |
77 |
> > > |
78 |
> > > |
79 |
> > |
80 |
> > So he should use either /hardened/amd64 or /hardened/amd64/multilib. If i rememember it right, the |
81 |
> > other profile (/hardened/linux/* ) is not under control by the hardened team and because of that not |
82 |
> > supported. |
83 |
> |
84 |
> Correct. |
85 |
> |
86 |
> amd64 #1 or #2 (suggested #2) |
87 |
> x86 #1 |
88 |
> |
89 |
|
90 |
This is what I wanted to know. Thanks. |