| 1 |
I checked in the modules.conf and it is not included in the base and it |
| 2 |
does have an ebuild in both the stable and ~arch portage trees. I'm |
| 3 |
sure you would probably prefer me to open a bug on it, but the missing |
| 4 |
selinux module is services/uwimap. If I understand (and I think I do at |
| 5 |
this point) the way the .te file is written it should have a dependency |
| 6 |
on services/inetd |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
On 11/08/2011 10:57 AM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
| 10 |
> Hi Stan, |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> There are three possible reasons why you will not find an appropriate ebuild |
| 13 |
> for a specific SELinux policy: |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> - The module itself is part of the base policy and as such is included in |
| 16 |
> the selinux-base-policy build (not extract only). You can see which |
| 17 |
> modules are part of base by looking at the |
| 18 |
> selinux-base-policy/files/modules.conf file in the portage tree. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> - The module itself is for a software package that is not in the Portage |
| 21 |
> tree (yet) |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> - We forgot to create one ;-) |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> So by all means, if you think we need an ebuild for a specific policy |
| 26 |
> module, ask and I'll gladly add it to the tree. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Wkr, |
| 29 |
> Sven Vermeulen |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Stan & HD Tashi Grad 10/08 Edgewood, NM SWR |
| 34 |
PR - Cindy and Jenny - Sammamish, WA NWR |
| 35 |
http://www.cci.org |
Archives