| 1 |
On 08/06/13 13:04, Alex Efros wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:58:12PM +0800, Pavel Labushev wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I wouldn't call such news good. KERNEXEC, especially on x86_64, plays a |
| 4 |
>> big role in protecting the kernel from both local and remote attacks. |
| 5 |
>> KVM doesn't require such arguable compromises (no pun intended). |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> True. But KVM unable to run Mac OS X, that's main reason to use VirtualBox. |
| 8 |
> Less important things: KVM don't support 3D acceleration; don't have |
| 9 |
> signed drivers for guest Windows (and thus require switching Windows to |
| 10 |
> "Testing mode" to install drivers); sometimes it need awful tricks like |
| 11 |
> building custom BIOS from patches sources; I can't give my KVM virtual |
| 12 |
> machines to friends which use Windows as host OS; etc. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I have no Windows license to test this, but as far as I found these |
| 15 |
drivers should be signed: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/virtio-win/latest/ |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
- Matthias-Christian |
Archives