| 1 |
On 08/14/2011 04:17 AM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi guys, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Many hardened profiles still pmask the following GCCs: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> =sys-devel/gcc-4.3.2* |
| 7 |
> =sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1* |
| 8 |
> =sys-devel/gcc-4.4.3-r2 |
| 9 |
> =sys-devel/gcc-4.4.4 |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> These packages are not available in the tree (nor hardened-dev overlay) |
| 12 |
> anymore, yet are referenced by |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> /usr/portage/profiles/selinux/2007.0/x86/hardened/package.mask |
| 15 |
> /usr/portage/profiles/selinux/2007.0/amd64/hardened/package.mask |
| 16 |
> /usr/portage/profiles/selinux/v2refpolicy/x86/hardened/package.mask |
| 17 |
> /usr/portage/profiles/selinux/v2refpolicy/amd64/hardened/package.mask |
| 18 |
> /usr/portage/profiles/hardened/package.mask |
| 19 |
> /usr/portage/profiles/hardened/linux/package.mask |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Okay if those get removed? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Report courtesy of http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/invalid-mask.txt |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Wkr, |
| 26 |
> Sven Vermeulen |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Its lint and can be removed. It doesn't do any harm masking a package |
| 29 |
that doesn't exist, but it does clutter the already hard to read profiles. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 33 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 34 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 35 |
GnuPG FP : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88 33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535 |
| 36 |
GnuPG ID : D0455535 |
Archives