| 1 |
On Sze, Április 2, 2008 16:59, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> 3. IIUC, the current status is to wait for "upstream" (the gcc folks?) |
| 4 |
> to successfully incorporate ssp into c++ compilations? And also that |
| 5 |
> with rare exception, little is loss using the older 3.4.6 compiler? |
| 6 |
> In those rare cases, gcc can be "slotted" so that 3.4.6 would be the |
| 7 |
> default, but 4.x could be called to duty when 3.4.6 won't work? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Might be useful to note this in the white paper. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Apart from waiting for incorporating ssp into c++ compilations 4.x can |
| 13 |
still be used with the old 3.4.6 behavior. I'm using the following |
| 14 |
modified specs from solar for months now with success (along with some |
| 15 |
minor eclass modifications - http://atoth.sote.hu/~atoth/specs). Of course |
| 16 |
it omits ssp at the same places where 3.4.6 omitted it too. |
| 17 |
What if the hardened community would move on to 4.x without minispecs, |
| 18 |
using the well-known 3.4.6 mechanism (as some of us had already did)? |
| 19 |
There would be still time for transition to novel implementation of ssp |
| 20 |
for c++, implementing ebuild support for minispecs and all other stuff. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Regards, |
| 23 |
Dwokfur |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus Szakorvos jelölt, 06-20-825-8057, 06-30-5962-962 |
| 26 |
Attila Toth MD, Radiologist in Training, +36-20-825-8057, +36-30-5962-962 |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-hardened@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives