| 1 |
Hi! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:28:27PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 4 |
> My plan then is as follows. I'll wait one more month and then send out |
| 5 |
> a news item and later mask hardened-sources for removal. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Well, it's about a month now. I didn't replied earlier because others |
| 8 |
already mentioned all good ideas and I was hoping these ideas will be |
| 9 |
accepted… :( |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
But, just in case, I'm +1 for both ideas to keep 4.9 LTS support as long |
| 12 |
as possible (and mark one of hardened-sources-4.9.x as stable) to give us |
| 13 |
a couple of years to find another solution and/or develop a migration plan |
| 14 |
from GrSecurity/PaX to RSBAC (or anything else which provide best |
| 15 |
available security level for modern kernels) - anything better than just |
| 16 |
"switch to gentoo-sources and enable SeLinux to feel real pain" will go. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Seriously, which options we actually have right now, if hardened-sources |
| 19 |
will be masked on next week and removed from the tree on next month? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
WBR, Alex. |
Archives