1 |
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:05:12 +0000 |
2 |
Kevin Chadwick wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> I know a bug on bugzilla has been incorrectly closed ages ago so I've |
5 |
> tried a mail to the mozilla sec list which you can see here. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> "http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.security/browse_thread/thread/7bf8def6b73bf0e5#" |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
It would be good if people could provide any bugzilla numbers that they have to hand. |
11 |
|
12 |
I'll try to hunt down the one that I refered to as closed ages ago. |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
----- Responses from Mozilla Sec Dev Mailing list ----- |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:33:37 -0800 (PST) |
20 |
Ian Melven wrote: |
21 |
|
22 |
> |
23 |
> Hi Kevin, |
24 |
> |
25 |
> in a current FF 9 release I see the following prefs : |
26 |
> |
27 |
> javascript.options.jitprofiling.chrome;true |
28 |
> javascript.options.jitprofiling.content;true |
29 |
> javascript.options.methodjit.chrome;true |
30 |
> javascript.options.methodjit.content;true |
31 |
> javascript.options.methodjit_always;false |
32 |
> javascript.options.tracejit.chrome;true |
33 |
> javascript.options.tracejit.content;true |
34 |
> |
35 |
> does setting these options to false let Firefox run under PAX |
36 |
> with RWX disabled ? |
37 |
> |
38 |
> (also please note that there is no more tracejit in Firefox 10 and later) |
39 |
> |
40 |
> thanks ! |
41 |
> ian |
42 |
_________________________ |
43 |
|
44 |
Hi, thanks for responding. |
45 |
|
46 |
Unfortunately not. |
47 |
|
48 |
____________________ |
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
|
52 |
Hi, |
53 |
|
54 |
sorry to hear that. |
55 |
|
56 |
do you have the bug # for the bug that was closed ? alternately i can open |
57 |
up a new bug and try to make sure it stays on track (and stays open) |
58 |
|
59 |
thanks |
60 |
ian |