Re: [gentoo-hardened] Which hardened (SUB)project

[Brian Davis]

The only comment I'll make is that Reiserfs doesn't support SELinux.

Alexander Gabert wrote:
> Constantine D. Kardaris wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 15 November 2006 12:44, Mathieu CASTEL wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I want to install a gentoo server with some hardened packages. I have tryed
>>> to install SELinux and I ran into some problems, no I have some clues to
>>> make it work, but I would like to know which hardened project would suit me
>>> well. I have seen SELinux, RSBAC.... I want to install on my server a samba
>>> sharing, in local, and a ssh, web and ftp server. There won't be a lot of
>>> users using it, it's for a peronal server, but I d like to put in some
>>> security features. What do you advise me?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>>> Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions
>>> ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des
>>> internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
>>>
>> Its actually on your own taste.
>> Try them all and keep the solution that fits you best...
>> IMHO rsbac and grsecurity are more complete solutions.
>>
>> con
>>
>>
>
>
> complete in terms of hardened support for policy and high quality
> developer contacts: selinux
>
> complete in terms of easy learning curve, self learning rules and
> hands-on experience: grsecurity
>
> complete in terms of scientific advantage, full covering framework and
> configurable to your hearts content without making sacrifices to any
> single component: rsbac
>
>
> make your choice, as he said :)
>
>
> Alex
>
-- 
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list