1 |
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 08:21 -0800, Grant wrote: |
2 |
> > > I don't know what RBAC is but I'm guessing I would know if I were |
3 |
> > > using it. I don't have grsec or any other "Security options" enabled |
4 |
> > > in the kernel at all. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > it's grsecurity's access control system and when not set up properly, |
7 |
> > it could also cause this ENOENT error. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> grsec would have to be enabled in the kernel config though right? I |
10 |
> definitely don't have it enabled there. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> > > Copying /bin/ls to /opt/bin/ls and executing it works perfectly. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > ok, so it's very likely a 32 bit only problem. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > > I don't know of any 32-bit binaries on my system except wengophone, |
17 |
> > > skype, and firefox-bin and they all fail. |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > ok, another idea: have you got /lib/ld-linux.so.2 on your system? it's |
20 |
> > needed for dynamically linked apps, i think it's in emul-linux-x86-compat. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> I do not have ld-linux.so.2 anywhere on my system but |
23 |
> emul-linux-x86-compat is installed. The ELOG for that package says |
24 |
> files are only installed in /usr/lib32/ and the closest things to |
25 |
> ld-linux.so.2 are /usr/lib32/ld-linux.so.1.9.11 and |
26 |
> /usr/lib32/ld-linux.so.1. I Googled but I can't figure out which |
27 |
> package ld-linux.so.2 belongs to. Any other package ideas? |
28 |
> |
29 |
> > on a sidenote, the RPATH in qtwengophone is a disaster, someone should |
30 |
> > let them know... |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Is it a Gentoo problem or upstream? |
33 |
|
34 |
I think it's unique to you. Remerge glibc and or create the proper |
35 |
symlink in /lib/ so that the PT_INTERP can be found. |
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |