| 1 |
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:47:28 -0700 (PDT) |
| 2 |
Vieri <rentorbuy@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> --- pageexec@××××××××.hu wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > On 26 Mar 2007 at 14:04, Vieri wrote: |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > > (apart from paxtest - which seems to be deprecated |
| 10 |
> > - I still wouldn't |
| 11 |
> > > know how to test drive it). |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > why does it seem to be deprecated? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I'm assuming it's deprecated because the chpax ebuild |
| 16 |
> says that chpax is deprecated and an emerge paxtest |
| 17 |
> requires chpax. |
| 18 |
> But again, I'm a novice in the PAX world so I may have |
| 19 |
> done a wrong assumption. |
| 20 |
Hi, |
| 21 |
paxtest depends on both chpax & paxctl - they serve the same purpose. |
| 22 |
Only chpax is used with older binutils (IMHO not in portage any more), |
| 23 |
so chpax *is* deprecated (currently). |
| 24 |
But 'paxctl' isn't-don't know is paxtest really depends on any of them. |
| 25 |
Check the source or (ask the author ;), been here recently IIRC. |
| 26 |
HTH. Rumen |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives